Suitability and context for brief therapy

The main point of this paper is that a client’s suitability for brief or time-limited therapy is determined by various factors, including context. There is still agreement on the validity of Malan’s selection criteria, which included ‘mild illness, recent onset, high motivation and response to trial interpretation’, yet many additional issues have since emerged and need to be considered. For instance, the counsellor’s suitability, training and work experience, the counsellor’s assessment skills and ability to establish a dynamic focus, the clients’ capacity for self-reflection, their ego strength and their response to a trial therapy in the first session. Then there is the importance of the various contexts in which nowadays much brief counselling is offered free to clients, whether in education, at the workplace, in primary healthcare settings or by charitable organizations. This means that issues of money and markets have come to the fore and an initial differential assessment needs to be carried out in order to decide which method or model of therapy is best for the client. Matching the counsellor’s personality to the needs and to the pathology of the client, and matching the treatment to the client’s developmental stage or life stage crises are other aspects of the work, which determine the issue of suitability. In the end as always there is much that remains unknown about what works for whom and how the client’s decision to take up help is made.